![]() lol), but making a rule that save stating to reset is not allowed anymore. The default leaderboard decision is to keep the run up, since it met the requirements of the proof policy at the time (c'mon guys, it's not like he used codes or anything. ![]() It's kinda messed up how this thing got overlooked. I love how a lot of non-FM runners are making a fuss here, but let's get to the point: Keep in mind Vino, Saboom and I will all most likely be running the category! As well as many others. Even if from now on savestates are on 100% lockdown due to what I said about gaining no advantage.įor anyone who disagree's with the record. I believe seeing as my record only gained an advantage in reset time in the long run that it should stand, however it's sort of a clash seeing as many runners have differing opinions. Now I will continue to run this category, without savestates. Even without savestates you can recieve similar decks! If we are saying that decks change on a frame by frame basis then I did not recieve any advantage because there was a gap between the gap in which I selected my decks, I have shown the stats (from rewatching the broadcast) here: ![]() Despite the fact that I said the decks were similar that was only a handful of cards, mostly based on the first hand which featured 4 from the previous. However, the particular savestate I used for the run was only used twice. Until then I thought this 'advantage' that you claim was just a rare occurence. The rule wasn't shown as strictly not allowed, I only found this out after mergy told me. As cyber said, his 'advantage' has not created some record than cannot be beat, it's still perfectly beatable. I feel as a community, we should be praising and celebrating people's runs, not illegitimising them. In regards to m13's run, he worked for his PB and obtained it before this rule was in place. I play the game on emulator (at least on NTSC), but if I ran this game on console and saw people gaining an advantage by save states I'd probably just stop. ![]() If save states do create an advantage, it's unfair on the people who run this game on legitimate consoles and copies of the game. However, I find it a bit suspect that this issue is brought up after m13 obtained the record, despite this issue being known beforehand.Īs for the 'ruling', I agree with it. ![]() If it turns out that resetting via save states enables an advantage over consoles in regards to similar decks, then it should probably be looked into. I personally feel save states are fine in some situations (quick exit from the game to restart for example) and in others they're obviously wrong (deck resetting in a race for example). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |